Have Liphook house prices beaten inflation?
Short answer: yes, comfortably. In real terms — after adjusting every year’s sold prices for inflation (CPIH) — Liphook homes are +110% since 1995, versus a headline +367% rise that ignores the falling value of money. They have grown in real terms, but still sit below their 2020 real-terms peak.
Real-terms summary
in 2020
A home that sold for £100,625 in Liphook in 1995 would need to fetch £223,435 today just to hold its value against inflation. The actual median today is £470,000 — so buyers really are paying more in real terms.
Year by year: Liphook median, cash vs real
Every year’s median sold price, then the same price restated in 2026 money using ONS CPIH — so you can see which years actually beat inflation.
| Year | Median sold (cash) | In today’s money (real) | Real change YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | £100,625 | £223,435 | — |
| 1996 | £92,500 | £200,654 | −10% |
| 1997 | £97,250 | £206,199 | +3% |
| 1998 | £125,000 | £259,191 | +26% |
| 1999 | £139,975 | £285,209 | +10% |
| 2000 | £222,125 | £444,250 | +56% |
| 2001 | £180,000 | £352,990 | −21% |
| 2002 | £194,950 | £376,032 | +7% |
| 2003 | £237,500 | £448,894 | +19% |
| 2004 | £250,000 | £463,816 | +3% |
| 2005 | £278,000 | £506,434 | +9% |
| 2006 | £270,000 | £480,682 | −5% |
| 2007 | £268,750 | £467,247 | −3% |
| 2008 | £275,000 | £461,607 | −1% |
| 2009 | £270,000 | £443,706 | −4% |
| 2010 | £332,000 | £530,147 | +19% |
| 2011 | £320,000 | £490,435 | −7% |
| 2012 | £338,750 | £505,972 | +3% |
| 2013 | £317,500 | £462,952 | −9% |
| 2014 | £357,500 | £512,792 | +11% |
| 2015 | £380,000 | £535,800 | +4% |
| 2016 | £415,000 | £579,356 | +8% |
| 2017 | £407,500 | £554,609 | −4% |
| 2018 | £436,250 | £581,392 | +5% |
| 2019 | £395,000 | £516,651 | −11% |
| 2020 | £450,000 | £582,645 | +13% |
| 2021 | £458,500 | £579,288 | −1% |
| 2022 | £500,000 | £579,293 | 0% |
| 2023 | £479,950 | £518,567 | −10% |
| 2024 | £520,000 | £547,164 | +6% |
| 2025 | £450,000 | £459,783 | −16% |
| 2026 | £470,000 | £470,000 | +2% |
Real figures adjust each year’s median to 2026 money using ONS CPIH. Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright, OGL v3.0.
Liphook’s real-terms peak was 2020
Liphook’s house prices hit their real-terms peak in 2020, at £582,645 in today’s money. Since then they have fallen −19% in real terms — even where the cash figure kept climbing.
The real story behind the price tag
Over 31 years, Liphook’s median rose +367% in cash. But once every year is restated in 2026 money, the genuine increase is +110%. The gap between the two is inflation dressed up as growth — the part of the rise that only kept pace with the falling pound.
Between 2005 and 2015, real prices here moved +6% — effectively flat across a whole decade, a reminder that cash charts and real charts can tell very different stories about the same market.
Cash price vs real value, side by side
The cash line is the price tag; the real line is that price in 2026 money. Where they pull apart is inflation at work.
Liphook house prices in real terms — your questions
Have Liphook house prices kept up with inflation?
Yes — after adjusting for inflation, Liphook prices are +110% since 1995, against a cash rise of +367%. The gap between the two is inflation.
What is Liphook’s house price in real terms?
The median today is £470,000. A home that sold for the 1995 median of £100,625 would be worth £223,435 in today's money — that is the real-terms benchmark.
When were Liphook houses most expensive in real terms?
In 2020, when the median reached £582,645 in today's money. Prices are −19% against that real-terms peak now.
Why is the real-terms price lower than the cash price rise?
Because part of every cash increase is just inflation — the pound buying less over time. Restating each year’s price in today’s money (using ONS CPIH) removes that effect and shows the genuine change in what a home costs.
Go deeper
Compare other towns in real terms
Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right and ONS CPIH, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. See our methodology.